In true Christ-like fashion, televangelist and former presidential candidate Reverend Pat Robertson once again
shows why God's love is "the love that surpasses all understanding" (http://www.globaloutpouring.com/LovePower.html) with his decree that Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon's recent stroke is divine judgment (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10728347/from/RS.3/).
Of course, the fact that the man will be turning 78 on February 27th of this
year can't possibly come into play when one sees nothing but Old Testament-style retribution and punishment at every turn.
Yet using Robertson's logic, wouldn't one then have to wonder what other
77 year old men who experience strokes are being punished for as well?
Simply said, the Reverend Robertson's declaration
is just the most recent in a long line of ignorant, radical fundamentalist gibberish, as when he expressed the Christian principle
of turning the other cheek by advocating the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez in August of 2005 (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-08-22-Robertson-_x.htm).
Hmmm...did anyone else miss that lesson in Sunday School?
experience reading and researching both the Bible and many, many religious faiths, I could readily turn this blog into a point-by-point
refutation of Robertson's theology, but the exercise would undoubtedly be one of futility. Both Robertson and his one million
daily viewers (http://www.cbn.com/700club/ShowInfo/About/about700club.asp) are virtually immune to intelligent, rhetorical debate, preferring instead to tout their own version
of sophistry, one which combines fringe Christian theology with ultra-conservative politics in a medieval, alchemical-like
fashion, choosing for their crucible the American media in a style reminiscent of Machiavelli's El Principe.
I believe that statements such as Robertson's are the direct result
of a culture in America today that breeds contempt for reason and rationality,
a sort of neo-Counter Reformation to even-temperament itself. Such a social and political environment - as we have all seen
today - shuns diplomacy for war, integration for segregation, and inclusion for exclusion. In a society that increasingly
esteems the public opinion poll and Act Utilitarianism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism) more than ethics and the 14th Amendment, citizens appear eager to isolate those ideas and individuals
which are not popular by labeling them "liberal," "unAmerican," or even "godless." Instead of democracy which protects and
preserves the rights of the minority, we've grown into some Aristotelian monstrosity where the only equals of the dominant
party are themselves! Everyone else is seemingly relegated to inconsequentiality where the will of the majority usurps all.
And much of the responsibility for this culture of exclusion rests on the shoulders of our elected officials.
following passage from Niccolo Machiavelli's El Principe,
or The Prince, speaks poignantly to the issue today:
"A prince...must appear to all who see and hear him to be completely pious, completely faithful,
completely honest, completely humane, and completely religious. And nothing is more important than to appear to have that
last quality. Men judge more by their eyes than by their hands, because everyone can see but few can feel. Everyone can see
how you appear, few can feel what you are, and these few will not dare to oppose the opinion of the multitude when it is defended
by the majesty of the state."
So, as the Reverend Robertson quotes the Old Testament prophet Joel in supporting
his edict of condemnation, perhaps he should re-read Mark 12:28-31, where the law of love and inclusion replaces the law of
exclusion and judgment.
Which law are you following today?
Enter supporting content here
All text and
html coding appearing on www.literarian.org are
intellectual property of the respective
author(s) and are protected under
international copyright laws. The intellectual property
may not be downloaded except
by normal viewing process of the
browser. The intellectual property may not be copied to another
computer, transmitted, published, reproduced, stored,
manipulated, projected, or altered in any way, including without limitation any
digitization or synthesizing of the images, alone or with any other
material, by use of computer or other electronic means or any
other method or means now or hereafter known, without the
written permission of the respective Author(s). By
entering this site, you are agreeing to be bound by the terms of this
agreement. Entrance to this site is
expressly on these conditions which embody
all of the understandings and obligations
between the parties hereto. To
secure reproduction rights to any material here,
and to contact the respective Author(s), send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.